On "๐๐ถ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป Innovation" as an Important Theory: ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ
๐: "What exactly is so innovative about the ๐๐ถ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป idea? You can only attack a market from the high end or the low end. Inevitably, some attacks come from the low end. They start with lower quality and improve as they scale. That is basic mechanics. How is this 'evolutionary'?"
๐: "Well, it’s been awarded prizes and compared to the ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐ผ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป...by Clayton Christensen himself"
๐: "In the same league? Let me give you a Computer Science equivalency. It would be like awarding a grand prize to a paper that says: 'Operating systems have two types: those with a GUI and those without. Future competitors will use a GUI.'"
๐: "As opposed to... actual engineering?"
๐: "๐๐ซ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฌ. Compare that to database researchers using sophisticated algorithms to eke out a 5% improvement in real-time streaming, or theoretical papers with mathematics so complex only a genius can parse them. Awarding 'Disruption' a top academic prize is like giving the ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ to ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป ๐ง๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐๐น๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฟ or the ๐ฃ๐๐ฟ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฝ to ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐น ๐ ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ. It’s the wrong prize for the wrong game."
๐: "Wow. ๐. ๐๐๐. ๐ก๐ข๐ง. ๐๐ก๐ข๐ช. ๐๐ง. ๐ช๐๐ฆ. LIKE. ๐ง๐๐๐ฆ. The Emperor has fewer clothes than advertised.